MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226120522 · doi:10.28924/2291-8639-20-2022-23

On Some Properties of a New Truncated Model With Applications to Lifetime Data

2022· article· en· W4226120522 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Arshad, Oluwafemi Samson Balogun, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, Pelumi E. Oguntunde

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsWeibull distributionQuantile functionLog-logistic distributionApplied mathematicsLorenz curveLog-Cauchy distributionStatisticsDistribution (mathematics)Beta distributionPower functionOrder statisticBounded functionProbability distributionCumulative distribution functionMoment-generating functionInverse-chi-squared distributionProbability density functionMathematical analysisDistribution fitting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research explored the exponentiated left truncated power distribution which is a bounded model. Various statistical properties which include the moments and their associated measures, Bonferroni and Lorenz curves, reliability measures, shapes, quantile function, entropy, and order statistics were discussed in detail. A simulation study was provided and applications to two real-world data were considered. The performance of the exponentiated left truncated power distribution over other bounded models like Topp-Leone distribution, Beta distribution, Kumaraswamy distribution, Lehmann type–I distribution, Lehmann type–II distribution, generalized power function, Weibull power function, and Mustapha type–II distribution is quite commendable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207