MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226150888 · doi:10.35537/10915/133395

Auditoría en el siglo XXI

2022· book· es· W4226150888 on OpenAlexaff
Lorena María Martires

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditAuditor's reportHumanitiesPolitical scienceBusinessAccountingArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La obra contiene trabajos de investigación efectuados por docentes de la cátedra de Auditoría de la FCE, que versan sobre distintos temas actuales con impacto para el auditor como consecuencia del desarrollo tecnológico, económico y financiero generando desafíos y nuevas maneras de realizar las auditorías. A saber: la auditoría en un contexto inflacionario, compliance, criptomonedas, el impacto de nuevas tecnologías en el perfil del auditor y auditoría relacionada con prevención del lavado de activos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAccounting and Financial ManagementFrench-language works237,207