Deep Reinforcement Learning for RIS-Assisted FD Systems: Single or Distributed RIS?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter investigates reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted full-duplex multiple-input single-output wireless system, where the beamforming and RIS phase shifts are optimized to maximize the sum-rate for both single and distributed RIS deployment schemes. The preference of using the single or distributed RIS deployment scheme is investigated through three practical scenarios based on the links’ quality. The closed-form solution is derived to optimize the beamforming vectors and a novel deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm is proposed to optimize the RIS phase shifts. Simulation results illustrate that the choice of the deployment scheme depends on the scenario and the links’ quality. It is further shown that the proposed algorithm significantly improves the sum-rate compared to the non-optimized scenario in both single and distributed RIS deployment schemes. Besides, the proposed beamforming derivation achieves a remarkable improvement compared to the approximated derivation in previous works. Finally, the complexity analysis confirms that the proposed DRL algorithm reduces the computation complexity compared to the DRL algorithm in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it