MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226154885 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2022.3171499

A Novel Hybrid Method for Short-Term Probabilistic Load Forecasting in Distribution Networks

2022· article· en· W4226154885 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Bingzhi Wang, Mahdi Mazhari, C. Y. Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSaskPower
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Probabilistic logicSmart meterComputer scienceMarkov chain Monte CarloProbabilistic forecastingContext (archaeology)Monte Carlo methodTerm (time)Distributed generationRange (aeronautics)GridSmart gridUncertainty quantificationMathematical optimizationData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningRenewable energyBayesian probabilityEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, the evolution of loads and distributed energy resources has added great complexity and uncertainty to distribution networks. In such a context, a reliable characterization of the uncertainty associated with prediction is fundamental to the wide range of the newly emerging applications in the low-voltage level grid. In this regard, this paper proposes a novel method to solve the short-term probabilistic load forecasting (STPLF) problem in distribution networks in which the loads are usually too volatile to be forecasted accurately. The approach developed employs a Dirichlet process mixture model (DPMM) to handle the uncertainty of load patterns, which is inferred by a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based method. Thereafter, the DPMM representation of the load patterns is combined with a tree-based ensemble learning method to address the STPLF by solving a classification problem. The final result is averaged over all MCMC samples. The proposed technique is compared to selected benchmark methods at different aggregation levels using smart meter datasets collected from customers located in Ireland as well as the City of Saskatoon, SK, Canada. The results obtained demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms the benchmark methods in STPLF at the given aggregation levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207