MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of political culture and ideology in forming the moral character of a civil servant

2022· article· en· W4226158091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sadieva Guzal Olimovna

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Resources and Workforce
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivil servantIdeologyCharacter (mathematics)PoliticsMoral characterSocial sciencePolitical cultureServantSociologyManagementPolitical scienceLawMathematicsEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThe article gives a detailed analysis of the moral character of the civil servant, his political culture and its role in reducing political risks, the role of legal and organizational regulation of the civil service, types of such moral regulations, such as mandatory, prohibitive and recommendatory; The codes of professional conduct of civil servants developed in the USA, Germany, Great Britain, France, Canada and Australia are revealed and their professional experience in this sphere is given there.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and HumanitiesSame topicHuman Resources and WorkforceFrench-language works237,207