Identification of a differential metabolite-based signature in patients with late-stage knee osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Multiple disease phenotypes have been identified in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients based on anthropometric, sociodemographic and clinical factors; however, differential systemic metabolite-based signatures in OA patients are not well understood. We sought to identify differential plasma metabolome signatures in a cross-sectional sample of late-stage knee OA patients. Methods Plasma from 214 (56.5% female; mean age = 67.58 years) non-diabetic, non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m 2 , mean = 26.25 kg/m 2 ), radiographic KL 3/4 primary knee OA patients was analyzed by metabolomics. Patients with post-traumatic OA and rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify patient clusters based on metabolite levels. A refined metabolite signature differentiating patient clusters was determined based on ≥ 10% difference, significance by FDR-adjusted t -test (q-value < 0.05), and random forests importance score ≥1, and analyzed by AUROC. Bioinformatics analysis was used to identify genes linked to ≥2 annotated metabolites. Associated enriched pathways (q < 0.05) were determined. Results Two patient clusters were determined based on the levels of 151 metabolites identified. Metabolite signature refinement found 24 metabolites could accurately predict cluster classification within the sample (AUC = 0.921). Fifty-six genes were linked to at least 2 KEGG annotated metabolites. Pathway analysis found 26/56 genes were linked to enriched pathways including tRNA acylation and B-vitamin metabolism. Conclusion This study demonstrates systemic metabolites can classify a cross-sectional cohort of OA patients into distinct clusters. Links between metabolites, genes and pathways can help determine biological differences between OA patients, potentially improving precision medicine and decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".