A Blind Filtering Framework for Noisy Neonatal Chest Sounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chest sound— as the first and most commonly available vital signal for newborns— contains affluent information about their cardiac and respiratory health. However, neonatal lung sound auscultation is currently challenging and often unreliable due to the noise and interference, particularly for preterm infants. The noise often overlaps with the heart and lung contents in both time and frequency. Moreover, the frequency band of the useful components varies from one case to another, making it difficult to separate by fixed band-pass filtering. In this study, a single-channel Blind Source Separation (SCBSS) framework is proposed to separate newborns’ lung and heart sounds from noisy chest sounds recorded by a digital stethoscope. This method first decomposes the signal into a multi-resolution representation using a time-frequency transform, and then applies source separation algorithms, to find proper ad hoc frequency filters. In the simulation scenario, two different time-frequency transforms are considered; Stationary Wavelet Transform (SWT) with dyadic bases, and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) with redundant bases. The transforms are followed by three different source separation methods, namely Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Periodic Component Analysis ($\pi $CA), and Second Order Blind Identification (SOBI). The yielded combinations are applied to the chest sounds recorded from ninety-one preterm and full-term newborns. The results show that compared to raw signals, fixed band-pass filtering and seven other separation methods, the heart and lung sounds extracted by the proposed methods have higher quality index and also result in more reliable heart and respiratory rate estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".