MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226164177 · doi:10.1214/22-ejp825

On spectral distribution of sample covariance matrices from large dimensional and large k-fold tensor products

2022· article· en· W4226164177 on OpenAlexaff
Benoı̂t Collins, Jianfeng Yao, Wangjun Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of Probability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsTensor (intrinsic definition)CovarianceMoment (physics)Limit (mathematics)Rank (graph theory)CombinatoricsCentral limit theoremDistribution (mathematics)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsQuantum mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the eigenvalue distributions for sums of independent rank-one k-fold tensor products of large n-dimensional vectors. Previous results in the literature assume that k=o(n) and show that the eigenvalue distributions converge to the celebrated Marčenko-Pastur law under appropriate moment conditions on the base vectors. In this paper, motivated by quantum information theory, we study the regime where k grows faster, namely k=O(n). We show that the moment sequences of the eigenvalue distributions have a limit, which is different from the Marčenko-Pastur law, and the Marčenko-Pastur law limit holds if and only if k=o(n) for this tensor model. The approach is based on the method of moments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Journal of ProbabilitySame topicRandom Matrices and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207