MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226165053 · doi:10.25313/2617-572x-2022-2

PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF MECHANISMS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE FIELD OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC SECURITY OF UKRAINE IN MODERN CONDITIONS

2022· article· en· W4226165053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Вікторія Іванова

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic scientific publication Public Administration and National Security · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)Competition (biology)TerrorismPoliticsChinaPolitical scienceGeneral partnershipForeign policyBusinessLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article investigates current priority areas for improving public administration mechanisms in the field of foreign economic security. In particular, it is noted that public administration in the field of foreign economic security is a dynamic process that develops over time, space and depends on many factors. It is established that the main political and security trends of today indicate that global contradictions are exacerbated in the world, which together with the ineffectiveness of international security instruments does not allow to resolve existing and provokes new conflicts. The competition of large powers is intensifying, in particular for resources - human, natural, economic, etc. Stronger international players seek to improve their positions at the expense of weaker ones... The nature of international conflicts is changing, in which non-military instruments are playing an increasing role: political-diplomatic, economic, information-psychological, cybernetic. Mercenaries, paramilitary groups, private military companies, criminal and terrorist organizations, and religious sects are increasingly used. It is determined that in the Foreign Policy Strategy of Ukraine, Ukraine’s relations with five countries (USA, Great Britain, Canada, Germany and France) have a strategic priority. However, the range of strategic partners is not limited to this. According to the document, Ukraine's strategic partners are Poland, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Romania, China and Brazil. It is also about the global partnership with Japan and the importance of cooperation with India. In turn, it emphasizes the priority of developing relations with neighboring countries, in particular, bringing contacts with Moldova to a strategic level. It is proposed to introduce into the practice of public administration of national security of Ukraine a conceptual model of formation of mechanisms of public administration in the field of foreign economic security, as well as an integrated model of institutional matrix of public administration in the field of foreign economic security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic scientific publication Public Administration and National SecuritySame topicEconomic Issues in UkraineFrench-language works237,207