GNSS Spoofing Detection and Mitigation in Multireceiver Configuration via Tracklets and Spoofer Localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) sensors estimate its position, velocity, and time (PVT) using pseudorange measurements. When there is no interference, the pseudoranges are due to authentic satellites, and the bearings is distinguishable. Whereas, in the presence of any intentional interference source like spoofer, the pseudorange measurements owing to spurious signals and all the bearings from the same direction. These spurious attacks yield either no position or falsified position to the GNSS receiver. This paper proposes to install multiple GNSS receivers on a vehicle (assumed to be cooperative) to detect and mitigate the spoofing attack. While installing multiple GNSS receivers, we assume that each GNSS receiver’s relative position vector (RPV) is assumed to be known to other GNSS receivers. The installed GNSS receivers use the extended Kalman filter (EKF) framework to estimate their PVT. We proposed to calculate the equivalent-measurement and equivalent-measurement covariance of each GNSS receiver in the Cartesian coordinates in the tracklet framework. These tracklets are translated to the vehicle center using RPV to obtain translated-tracklets. The translated tracklet based generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) is derived to detect the spoofing attack at a given epoch. In addition to that, these translated-tracklets are processed in a batch least square (LS) framework to obtain the vehicle position. Once the attack is detected at a specific epoch, it quantifies that the position information is false. Moreover, another spoofing test is also formulated using DOA of signals. Once both the tests confirm the spoofing attack, the spoofer localization is performed using pseudo-updated states of GNSS receivers and acquired bearings in the iterative least-squares (ILS) framework. Mitigation of spoofing attack can be achieved either by projecting a null beam in the direction of the spoofer or by launching a counter-attack on the spoofer. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm detects spoofing attacks and ensures continuity in the navigation track. As the number of satellite signals increases, the algorithms provide better position root mean square error (PRMSE) for GNSS receivers track, vehicle track, and spoofer localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".