MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226182768 · doi:10.1145/3508072.3508111

Towards Optimal Placement of Cloud Edge Gateways

2021· article· en· W4226182768 on OpenAlexaff
George Daoud, Mohamed El-Darieby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe 5th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingSoftware deploymentEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionKey (lock)Global Positioning SystemDistributed computingArchitectureField (mathematics)Real-time computingThe InternetEdge computingComputer networkComputer securityTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IoT systems are instrumental in gathering real-time data that helps monitor the status of infrastructure systems. Understanding and characterizing key economical, operational, and technological factors affecting CPS/IoT system design is of high priority. We assume sensors are deployed following a hierarchical architecture in order to enable extended lifetime of sensing elements and enhance the cost-effectiveness of the system as a whole. Such architecture requires the deployment of gateways at the edge of the cloud/ Internet. In this paper, we describe an algorithm that helps designers of such IoT systems to locate gateways in an optimal manner that minimizes geographic areas uncovered by wireless coverage. We use a gradient descent-based method to optimize the location of gateways. We apply our algorithm on two different realistic maps extracted from Open Street Maps. The algorithms calculate the optimal location of gateways in GPS coordinates that can be directly used by field tools to install gateways with high precision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe 5th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed SystemsSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207