MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226183323 · doi:10.23977/jemm.2022.070106

Design of H∞ Predictive Controller for Networked Control System

2022· article· en· W4226183323 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenying Chen, Jingyu Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and Machinery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Dropout (neural networks)Network packetNetworked control systemComputer scienceModel predictive controlObserver (physics)Compensation (psychology)Lyapunov functionPacket lossController (irrigation)Linear matrix inequalityBernoulli's principleControl systemControl (management)MathematicsMathematical optimizationEngineeringNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a class of network control systems with both data packet dropout and network communication delay problems, a new robust model predictive control method with compensation function is proposed. Considering that the system has interference problems, in the two cases of long-delay and short-delay, the packet loss problem is established as a Bernoulli sequence, and then a discrete NCS model based on the state observer is obtained. The state observer in the model can deal with the data packet dropout compensate and predict the state of the long-delay problem. Through linear matrix inequality and Lyapunov method, the controller is designed to obtain sufficient conditions for the closed-loop system to be exponentially stable and meet the specified performance indicators. Finally, compared with the method without any compensation measures, the method in this paper can get better control effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and MachinerySame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207