Anomaly Prediction With Hybrid Supervised/Unsupervised Deep Learning for Elastic Optical Networks: A Multi-Index Correlative Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the emergence of new services, the complex optical network environment makes it more difficult to predict network anomalies. This paper proposes a multi-index anomaly prediction scheme with hybrid supervised/unsupervised deep learning for elastic optical networks. Aimed at complex optical network indicators, the scheme presents three phases to enhance the abnormal prediction. The scheme first selects the most influential indicators of anomaly label among the mass of network indicators by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient. Then, considering the timeliness of network data, it predicts time series of different indicators to analyze future network conditions by using long short-term memory neural network. In order to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the anomaly detection model, the scheme further establishes a deep neural network for anomaly classification. We also discuss how to process data without anomaly labels. The feasibility of the proposed scheme is verified on a real network dataset. Experimental results show that the scheme can predict the occurrence of future network anomalies with high accuracy, protect network services from potential abnormalities, and enhance the stability and robustness of the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it