“Squeaky/Pain”: Cultivando experiencias perturbadoras y la transición de perspectivas para las interacciones somaestéticas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A través del estudio de caso de un diseño, examinamos cómo la conciencia somaestética se ve amplificada por la intermediación de perturbaciones corporales y el cultivo de una transición desde una perspectiva de primera persona a una de segunda persona. El artículo se centra en el aspecto menos explorado del diseño somático: la mediación de experiencias perturbadoras que interrumpen el flujo cotidiano, en este caso, la experiencia de dolor. El proceso de diseño ilustró una transición entre las perspectivas de primera y segunda persona para cultivar y externalizar la experiencia con el dolor en la forma de una interacción corporal vestible. La experiencia del dolor externalizado se tradujo en un dispositivo vestible interactivo, “Squeaky/Pain”, que aumenta la conciencia somaestética del usuario a través de sensaciones sonoras, táctiles y cinestésicas. Este artículo hace dos contribuciones principales al diseño somático: introduce las implicaciones de las experiencias perturbadoras a la hora de aumentar la conciencia somaestética y ejemplifica de qué manera las perturbaciones corporales internas pueden materializarse mediante el cultivo de perspectivas en primera y segunda persona.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".