Extending Momentum Contrast With Cross Similarity Consistency Regularization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning methods maximize the similarity between the positive pairs, and at the same time tend to minimize the similarity between the negative pairs. However, in general the interplay between the negative pairs is ignored as they do not put in place special mechanisms to treat negative pairs differently according to their specific differences and similarities. In this paper, we present Extended Momentum Contrast (XMoCo), a self-supervised representation learning method founded upon the legacy of the momentum-encoder unit proposed in the MoCo family configurations. To this end, we introduce a cross consistency regularization loss, with which we extend the transformation consistency to dissimilar images (negative pairs). Under the cross consistency regularization rule, we argue that semantic representations associated with any pair of images (positive or negative) should preserve their cross-similarity under pretext transformations. Moreover, we further regularize the training loss by enforcing a uniform distribution of similarity over the negative pairs across a batch. The proposed regularization can easily be added to existing self-supervised learning algorithms in a plug-and-play fashion. Empirically, we report a competitive performance on the standard Imagenet-1K linear head classification benchmark. In addition, by transferring the learned representations to common downstream tasks, we show that using XMoCo with the prevalently utilized augmentations can lead to improvements in the performance of such tasks. We hope the findings of this paper serve as a motivation for researchers to take into consideration the important interplay among the negative examples in self-supervised learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".