Plaskett 1.8 m Observations of Starlink Satellites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present observations of 23 Starlink satellites in the g′ bandpass, obtained from the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory’s Plaskett 1.8 m telescope. The targets include a mixture of satellites with and without brightness mitigation measures (i.e., visors). At the time of the observations (2021 July 16), Starlink satellites were sunlit throughout the night, and, even with strict elevation and azimuth limits, there were over 800 candidate Starlink arcs. The satellites altogether have a median range corrected brightness (550 km) of H ¯ g 550 = 5.3 mag. Dividing the targets into those without and with visors, their median range corrected magnitudes are H ¯ g 550 ( no visor ) = 5.1 and H ¯ g 550 ( visor ) = 5.7 mag, respectively. While the visor sample is dimmer in aggregate, the range corrected brightness distribution ranged from H g 550 = 4.3 mag to 9.4 mag. The two brightest satellites have similar H g 550 to within the uncertainty, but one is visored and the other nonvisored. The dimmest satellite we observed is one without mitigations. The intrinsic brightness dispersion among the full sample is σ g = 0.5 mag.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".