MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226204414 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5692585

Tinjauan Line Stop Mold pada Proses Produksi Part Moulding Quarter Window Upper di PT. Autoplastik Indonesia

2021· article· en· W4226204414 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dene Herwanto Angga Setya Prawira

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindow (computing)Quarter (Canadian coin)MoldLine (geometry)Materials scienceComputer scienceComposite materialMathematicsHistoryOperating systemArchaeologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\tPT. Autoplastic Indonesia is a manufacturing company that produces various automotive components made from plastic. PT. Autoplastic Indonesia uses 3 lines, namely the plastic injection line, painting line, and assembling line. However, there is damage to the mold that causes a line stop or the production process stops, so that it can cost time and material. With this research, it is expected to find out the causes and consequences of problems that occur in the mold system that is used as a mold to make these products so that repairs can be made to damage quickly and permanently and there will be no long and detrimental line stops. The results of this study indicate that the damage experienced by this mold affects the production process and causes defects in the product in the form of silver defects caused by operators who are negligent in checking the conditions that occur. This silver defect arises due to delays in filling the material in the hopper and also caused by damp material.\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207