Bibliographic record
Abstract
La cuisine, pièce à vivre, est aussi un local technique dont l’outillage reflète l’évolution de l’équipement domestique ainsi que les exigences hygiéniques croissantes. Les journaux illustrés constituent une source inédite pour étudier la réception des innovations technologiques adaptées à l’espace culinaire. Ils proposent non seulement des histoires familiales qui le mettent en scène, mais aussi des articles illustrés sur les salons d’arts ménagers et, depuis les années 1930, des BD publicitaires où les appareils ménagers sont rois. Le fourneau, la cuisinière, le réfrigérateur, appareil genré – dans les images de BD plutôt féminin en France, mais masculin aux USA –, la machine à laver le linge, l’aspirateur, ainsi que le petit appareillage ménager et les ustensiles de cuisine, apparaissent ainsi dans des milliers d’images, allant du début du XXe siècle à nos jours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".