Blockchain-Based Privacy-Preserving Authentication Model Intelligent Transportation Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) have gained popularity due to smart services and applications to facilitate the users on the roads. The increasing growth of users in these networks created new and complex data processing, storage, security, and privacy concerns. These networks are using centralized edge, fog, or cloud architecture for data management. User privacy is compromised in these networks due to the increasing demands and service provider’s services. To ensure the data privacy, the centralized architectures are used without privacy regulations. In this paper, we present a Blockchain-based Privacy-Preserving Authentication (BPPAU) model for ITS networks to ensures users privacy and security. The proposed model provides data storage, data accessing, and processing management by using a blockchain smartcontract system, access control policy and on demand based functions. The proposed model is tested in a simulation environment to check its performance in terms of transaction cost with data size, transaction per second analysis with block time, and computational time analysis with several transactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it