MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226226501 · doi:10.1039/d1ma00995h

Novel optical amorphous phosphate materials with a low melting temperature

2022· article· en· W4226226501 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon Kaser, Théo Guérineau, Clément Strutynski, Reda Mohammed Zaki, Marc Dussauze, Étienne Durand, Sandra Helena Messaddeq, Sylvain Danto, Younès Messaddeq, Thierry Cardinal

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhosphateGlass transitionAmorphous solidPhosphate glassMelting temperatureMaterials scienceChemical engineeringMineralogyComposite materialChemistryPolymerCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transparent hydrated phosphate glasses were prepared at 300 °C. Because it contains up to 40 mol% of water, the phosphate glass network is heavily modified and the glass transition temperature is lowered below 100 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials AdvancesSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207