MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226226649 · doi:10.1038/s41390-022-02040-9

Why monitor the neonatal brain—that is the important question

2022· article· en· W4226226649 on OpenAlexaff
Sampsa Vanhatalo, Nathan J. Stevenson, Ronit Pressler, Nicholas S. Abend, Stéphane Auvin, Francesco Brigo, Maria Roberta Cilio, Cecil D. Hahn, Hans Hartmann, Lena Hellström‐Westas, Terrie E. Inder, Solomon L. Moshé, Magda Lahorgue Nunes, Renée A. Shellhaas, Kollencheri Puthenveettil Vinayan, Linda S. de Vries, Jo M. Wilmshurst, Elissa Yozawitz, Geraldine B. Boylan

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthEvelyn TrustNational Health and Medical Research CouncilEuropean CommissionNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchHelsingin ja Uudenmaan SairaanhoitopiiriHelsingin YliopistoU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsNeurointensive careIntensive care medicineMedicineKey (lock)PediatricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key goal of neonatal neurocritical care is improved outcomes, and brain monitoring plays an essential role. The recent NEST trial1 reported no outcome benefits using aEEG monitoring compared to clinical seizure identification among neonates treated for seizures. However, the study failed to prove the effects of monitoring on seizure treatment in the first place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.013
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0090.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric ResearchSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207