MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226227507 · doi:10.1002/adts.202100400

Electronic Structure, Bonding, and Stability of Boron Subphthalocyanine Halides and Pseudohalides

2022· article· en· W4226227507 on OpenAlexafffund
Mariana Hildebrand, Devon Holst, Timothy P. Bender, Leeor Kronik

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Theory and Simulations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCompute Canada
KeywordsBoronHalideMoietySubstituentDensity functional theoryAtomic orbitalMoleculeChemistryMolecular orbitalSubstitution (logic)Derivative (finance)Ring (chemistry)Computational chemistryStructural stabilityMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryStructural engineeringPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Halides and pseudohalides of boron subphthalocyanine (BsubPc) are promising candidates for efficient yet stable organic photovoltaics. Here, the electronic structure of such molecules, obtained using density functional theory, is considered. Based on the calculations, it is found that the tetrameric boron bond is stabilized by an inductive effect at the axial substituent and by conjugative effects across the ring system. It is further found that stability is dictated mostly by the axial moiety, such that Br‐BsubPc is the most fitting precursor structure for further synthesis steps, whereas F‐BsubPc is the most suitable candidate for long‐term device performance. H‐BsubPc is examined as a new BsubPc derivative, and found to be too volatile for long term device performance. Finally, it is shown that peripheral substitution dictates the position of frontier orbitals, thereby allowing for essentially separate optimization of material properties and material stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Theory and SimulationsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207