CODEX: Stochastic Encoding Method to Relax Resistive Crossbar Accelerator Design Requirements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A stochastic input encoding scheme (CODEX) is presented that aims to relax the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) design requirements in memristor crossbar systems. CODEX reduces the ADC input range by encoding the input bits using Bernoulli statistics so that the bit-line current distribution becomes a narrow Gaussian. By reducing ADC input range, CODEX can be used to reduce ADC power and area or increase ADC resolution to reduce the number of epochs required for in-situ training. Besides input data encoding, CODEX includes probability thresholding for sparse input data as well as a random re-sampling method for dealing with ADC overflow. CODEX is evaluated on CIFAR-10 dataset image classification and reconstruction, sentiment classification, and audio classification. The results show an averaged 68.5% reduction in ADC power, 35.5% reduction in ADC area, and 25.8% reduction in training epochs required for in-situ training when applied to the state-of-the-art ISAAC and PUMA accelerators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".