Using parity-violating weak interaction to measure neutron matter density and search for new physics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The weak interaction is the only fundamental interaction in nature that violates parity symmetry. Parity-violation produces asymmetric outcomes in mirror image experiments. The high-precision asymmetry measurements, using electrons with rapidly flipping polarization as probes, have extraordinary scientific reach across various subfields. PREX-2 and MOLLER are two such experiments that can only be conducted at the state-of-the-art Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. The asymmetries (A_PV) measured at PREX-2 and MOLLER kinematics (Q^2), can help to estimate the density distributions in neutron-rich matter and search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model respectively. PREX-2 was conducted by scattering a longitudinally polarized 953 MeV electron beam elastically from 208Pb at a ~ 5 degree scattering angle. The measured asymmetry was A_PV = 550±16 [stat.]±8 [sys.] ppb at average Q^2 = 0.00616 GeV^2. Together with PREX-1, it imposes robust constraints on the interior baryon density (0.1480±0.0036 [exp.]±0.0013 [theo.] fm^−3) and the neutron skin (0.283±0.071 fm) of 208Pb. Model correlations between the neutron skin and the nuclear symmetry pressure indicate a stiff symmetry energy near the nuclear saturation density. Together with neutron star observations, it enhances the understanding of exotic matter states. In contrast to PREX-2, MOLLER will operate with an 11 GeV longitudinally polarized electron beam as the flagship experiment utilizing the 12 GeV upgrade at Jefferson Lab. The electrons will be scattered from atomic electrons in a liquid hydrogen target and the scattered electrons will be guided by a novel spectrometer with full azimuthal coverage to an array of quartz Cerenkov detectors. The asymmetry and consequently the weak charge of the electron will be measured to a precision of 2.4% at average Q^2 = 0.0056 GeV^2. The value of the electroweak mixing angle derived from the above measurement can be compared to the Standard Model prediction in search of a deviation. MOLLER is sensitive to new physics in the MeV to multi-TeV range. This dissertation details the PREX-2 measurement and the current design status of MOLLER, highlighting my contributions towards PREX-2 data analysis and optimization of MOLLER experimental subsystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".