MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226255298 · doi:10.37867/te130410

CULTURAL AND TRADITION INFLUENCE OF TULSIDAS RAMCHARITMANAS IN FIJI

2021· article· en· W4226255298 on OpenAlex
Zafar khan A Pathan, Swati Kapadia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTowards Excellence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaHomelandEPICIdentity (music)Cultural identityHistoryEthnologyIndian literatureGeographyAncient historyAnthropologyGender studiesSociologySocial sciencePolitical scienceLiteratureArtLawAestheticsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is based on the cultural and tradition influence of Tulsidas Ramcharitmanas in Fiji. In the nineteenth century, these indentured laborers who were separated from India left their country but retained their linguistic tradition and cultural wealth even in difficult times. The importance of cultural and influence of the epic Ramcharitmanas is spread in the world through various stories by the Indian Diaspora. The overseas Indians made the host-land their homeland, they had not only carried their Indian language but also Sanskari Gathari. Sanskari Gathari means Indian culture, rituals religious texts, etc. Indians in the host-land connect their story with Rama's exile; Indians as Indenture labourers or free migrants remember India every day in Fiji, Mauritius, Suriname, Trinidad, South Africa, Canada, etc. have their unique way to connect their identity to Lord Ram.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it