MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226263629 · doi:10.2138/am-2022-8276

The occurrence of monoclinic jarosite in natural environments

2022· article· en· W4226263629 on OpenAlexaff
Anne J. Whitworth, Helen E. A. Brand, Ian E. Grey, N. R. Stephen, Yesim Gozukara, Andrew J. Frierdich

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemJarositeCrystallographyRietveld refinementPowder diffractionMaterials scienceCrystal structureMineralogyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Jarosite and related subgroup minerals are of high importance in mineral processing, as sources and sinks for metals and acidity in the environment, and they have the potential to preserve elemental and isotopic biomarkers relevant to the search for life in the solar system. The crystal structures and chemistry of jarosite minerals affect their stability and reactivity and thus the roles they play in natural and engineered systems. Rhombohedral symmetry has been documented in natural and synthetic jarosites, whereas monoclinic symmetry has only been documented in synthetic jarosites. This research reports the occurrence of monoclinic symmetry in a natural natrojarosite sample investigated using synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Splitting of several rhombohedral PXRD peaks (e.g., 012, 027, and 033) into pairs of peaks was observed, with the magnitude of the splitting and the relative intensities of the pairs of peaks being almost identical to those reported for synthetic monoclinic jarosite. Rietveld refinement with room-temperature PXRD data shows an ordering of iron-site vacancies on the Fe1 site consistent with monoclinic symmetry, space group C2/m. Conversion of monoclinic unit-cell parameters into pseudo-hexagonal unit-cell parameters, specifically β′, also supports the use of a monoclinic model to describe the natrojarosite structure. Structural analysis with increasing temperature is supportive of the thermal evolution previously described for synthetic monoclinic jarosite samples, with some indications of subtle differences between synthetic and natural materials including slower rates of thermal expansion and absence of FeOHSO4 peaks for natural monoclinic jarosite. EBSD provides insight into the spatial–structural variation within the hand specimen from which the natrojarosite was sampled, demonstrating that there are areas of unambiguous monoclinic symmetry, but others where both monoclinic and rhombohedral natrojarosite coexist. The results of this study suggest that monoclinic symmetry in natural jarosites may be more prevalent than previous studies suggest. Monoclinic symmetry in jarosites is identifiable by an ordering of iron-site vacancies on the Fe1 site, splitting of specific rhombohedral XRD peaks into pairs of peaks, and an increase in jarosite symmetry (i.e., from monoclinic to rhombohedral) during heating. The splitting of peaks in monoclinic jarosites can be subtle so it is recommended that high-resolution XRD data are collected when studying the crystal structure of jarosites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207