MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4226283778 · doi:10.7538/zpxb.2020.0140

Design and Simulation of Focusing Drift Tube for Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer

2022· article· en· W4226283778 on OpenAlexaff
HE Fei-yao, DAI Jian-xiong, FU Yu, Hong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrift tubeProtonSpectrometerTube (container)Mass spectrometryTransfer (computing)PhysicsNuclear physicsMaterials scienceOpticsComputer scienceIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drift tube is one of the core components of proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS). Technical innovation of the drift tube is one of the important ways to improve the performance of the instrument. In recent years, focusing drift tube (FDT) has been paid more and more attention because of its high ion utilization ratio. In this work, the design and simulation of a FDT combined with a radio frequency quadrupole and a resistor glass tube was reported. The quadrupole was used to provide an RF focusing field, and the resistor glass tube was used to generate a uniformly distributed DC gradient electric field. Based on the designed 3D structure, the simulation model was built in SIMION 8.1 and the parameters such as the diameter of the quadrupole, the frequency and the voltage amplitude of the RF field were simulated systematically with three kinds of ions (m/z 19, 55 and 100). The results showed that the introduction of the RF field was very effective in reducing the radius of the ion beam, and the rod with larger diameter was beneficial to improve the ion focusing efficiency, especially for the ions with low mass-charge ratio. When the frequency was about 2 MHz, the focusing efficiency was the highest. With the increase of the voltage amplitude, the radius of ion beam decreased rapidly and finally tended to smooth. In addition, more than 85% of the ions could successfully pass through the sampling orifice with a diameter of 1.0 mm, and the transport efficiency was about 28 times higher than that of the traditional drift tube. In this study, structural design, SIMION modeling and ion transmittance of RF quadrupole focusing drift tube (RFQ-FDT) were described in detail, hoping to provide some technical support for follow-up research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicEngineering Applied Research→French-language works237,207→