The Trend-Fuzzy-Granulation-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Cognitive Map for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One drawback of using the existing one-step forecasting models for long-term time series prediction is the cumulative errors caused by iterations. In order to overcome this shortcoming, this article proposes a trend-fuzzy-granulation-based adaptive fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) for long-term time series forecasting. Different from the original FCM-based forecasting models, a class of trend fuzzy information granules is built to represent the trend, fluctuation range, and trend persistence of various segments of time series, which are more instrumental and comprehensive than simple magnitude information. Thus, the proposed forecasting model is a granular model according to the form of its inputs and outputs. In an original FCM-based forecasting model, the causal relationships among concepts remain unchanged throughout the training of the whole dataset, however, in reality, the causal relationships may change with the state of concepts. Therefore, it is unreasonable to use the invariable causal relationships which often result in poor predictions. In view of this, we construct an adaptive FCM where different causal relationships are built to forecast concepts of different states. This is the first time to forecast trend fuzzy information granules using an adaptive FCM. Compared with the existing classical forecasting models, the proposed forecasting model achieves superior performance which is verified through a series of experimental studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".