MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226326700 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-14851

Formalization of Cyber-Physical System Interface using Discrete Event System Specifications

2022· dissertation· en· W4226326700 on OpenAlexaff
Rishabh Jiresal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyber-physical systemInterface (matter)DEVSComputer scienceBridge (graph theory)Field (mathematics)Event (particle physics)ArchitectureFunction (biology)Distributed computingPhysical systemUser interfaceEmbedded systemModeling and simulationSimulationProgramming languageOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyber-Physical systems are complex engineered systems that integrate embedded computing into the physical environment.These systems are considered to be "safetycritical" due to their application in the field of medical, transportation, or building control.CPS is composed of tight coupling of the physical and cyber worlds, and the interfaces are interactions that are defined as a bridge between these worlds.The interface is a fundamental characteristic of a CPS and CPS cannot function without it.In this thesis, we propose an architecture of the CPS interface in Discrete EVent System Specification (DEVS) that mimics the functionality of CPS interactions.DEVS provides a formal platform for M&S of discrete event dynamic systems.We propose a DEVS simulation model named DCIF (DEVS CPS Interface Framework) that portrays the complete working of the CPS interface.Later, we also implement and evaluate this interface on real-time hardware.The architecture is verified by creating a synthetic environment that includes multiple test cases in the simulation as well as real-time implementation.Additionally, we apply this framework to a practical case study in the field of building information modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207