On the Achievable Capacity of Cooperative NOMA Networks: RIS or Relay?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this letter, a novel reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)- and relay-assisted cooperative network with non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) is proposed, where the line-of-sight (LoS) and non-LoS (NLoS) scenarios are both considered for different locations of users. For the proposed cooperative NOMA systems, we first analyze the capacities of the RIS- and relay-assisted downlinks, respectively. Since it is difficult to obtain the closed-form expressions in terms of the achievable capacity, we apply the central limit theorem (CLT) and Jensen’s inequality to determine a tight upper bound for the channel gain. Then, we focus on the solutions in relay and RIS providing more capacity advantages. Numerical and simulation results verify the correctness of the derived expressions and the superiority of our proposed model. Finally, we clarify that, with different conditions of the transmit scenarios, RIS- and relay-assisted cooperative networks show their various advantages and limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it