MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ELIXIR biovalidator for semantic validation of life science metadata

2022· article· en· W4226329328 on OpenAlexaff
Isuru Liyanage, Tony Burdett, Bert Droesbeke, Karoly Erdos, Rolando Fernandez, Alasdair J. G. Gray, Muhammad Haseeb, Simon Jupp, Flavia Penim, Cyril Pommier, Philippe Rocca‐Serra, Mélanie Courtot, Frederik Coppens

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean Bioinformatics Institute
KeywordsValidatorComputer scienceLicenseSchema (genetic algorithms)Elixir (programming language)Information retrievalMetadataJSONSemantic integrationWorld Wide WebProgramming languageSemantic Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: To advance biomedical research, increasingly large amounts of complex data need to be discovered and integrated. This requires syntactic and semantic validation to ensure shared understanding of relevant entities. This article describes the ELIXIR biovalidator, which extends the syntactic validation of the widely used AJV library with ontology-based validation of JSON documents. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code: https://github.com/elixir-europe/biovalidator, Release: v1.9.1, License: Apache License 2.0, Deployed at: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biosamples/schema/validator/validate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207