MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226341018 · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3158006

A Hybrid Five-Level Modular Multilevel Converter With High Efficiency and Small Energy Storage Requirements for HVDC Transmission

2022· article· en· W4226341018 on OpenAlexafffund
Levi Bieber, Joel Pfannschmidt, Liwei Wang, Juri Jatskevich, Wei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)Okanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModular designEnergy storageComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)HVDC converter stationElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)VoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a hybrid five-level converter (H5LC) with cascaded full-bridge submodules (FBSMs) for high voltage direct current (HVdc) transmission. A five-level converter operates at a fundamental switching frequency to generate symmetric five-level square wave output voltages which are shaped into smooth sinusoidal voltages by the ac-side FBSMs. Using a proposed third-order harmonic voltage injection scheme, the FBSMs’ total blocking voltage is limited to one-eighth of the dc-side voltage, reducing the H5LC's losses, footprint, and capital costs. dc pole-to-pole fault blocking is enabled using a bypass branch consisting of bidirectional thyristor valves and fast mechanical switches to suppress the ac-side fault contribution within half a fundamental cycle. Full-scale HVdc simulation studies show the H5LC's ability to control real and reactive powers and additionally, its dc fault resilience. A lab-scale hardware implementation of an H5LC with 30 FBSMs is presented to verify its operating principle. In contrast to the half-bridge submodule based modular multilevel converter, the H5LC has improved efficiency, fewer semiconductor devices, and significantly reduced energy storage requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207