Characterizing posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care using electronic medical records: a retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic mental health disorder associated with significant morbidity and economic cost. Primary care providers are frequently involved in the ongoing management of patients experiencing PTSD, as well as related comorbid conditions. Despite recognized need to enhance PTSD management in primary care settings, knowledge regarding its prevalence in these settings is limited. Objective: To apply a validated case definition of PTSD to electronic medical records (EMRs) of family physicians and nurse practitioners participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Dataset: This study accessed de-identified EMR from 1,574 primary care providers participating in the CPCSSN. Population Studied: The study population included all patients with at least one visit to a primary care provider participating in the CPCSSN between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 (N = 689,301). Outcome Measures: We identified patients with PTSD and described associations between PTSD and patient characteristics (including sex, age, geography, depression, anxiety, medical comorbidities, substance use and social and material deprivation) using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Among the 689,301 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 8,213 (1.2%) had a diagnosis of PTSD. Patients with PTSD were significantly more likely to reside in an urban location (84.9% vs. 80.4%; p-value <.0001) and have one or more comorbid conditions (90.8% vs. 70.2%; p-value <.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with depression (OR 4.8; 95%CI 4.6-5.1) and anxiety (OR 2.2; 95%CI 2.1-2.3) had increased odds of having PTSD compared to patients without depression or anxiety. Patients with alcohol (OR 1.8; 95%CI 1.6-1.9) and drug (OR 3.1; 95%CI 2.9-3.3) use disorders had significantly higher odds of PTSD compared to patients without these disorders. Patients in the most deprived neighborhoods based on census data had 4.2 times higher odds of have PTSD (95%CI 3.2-5.43) compared to patients in the least deprived areas. Conclusions: This is the first study to describe PTSD prevalence in a large Canadian sample of primary care patients using an EMR-based case definition. Characterizing patients with PTSD in primary care may improve disease surveillance and inform the interdisciplinary care required to manage PTSD symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".