Influence of Physical Rehabilitation on the Restoration of Psychoemotional and Cognitive Impairment in Patients Suffered Cerebral Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the influence of physical rehabilitation on psycho-emotional and cognitive impairment in patients in a restoration period (3-6 months from the moment of disease) of a cerebral ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods: Research was conducted on the basis of the department of vascular pathology and rehabilitation of the State Institution “Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”. Observations were carried out in 84 patients in a restorative period of cerebral ischemic stroke. Patients were divided into two groups. The main group included 43 patients who underwent a course of rehabilitation treatment and received drug therapy within secondary prevention. The comparison group included 41 patients who received only drug therapy for secondary prevention. Results: In the course of the study, it was found that patients who underwent a course of restorative treatment with the use of drug therapy and physical rehabilitation programs received statistically significant improvement in the indicators of cognitive functions by the MMSE, MoCA scales, reduction of manifestations of psycho-emotional disorders that were confirmed by Beck and Spielberger-Khanin scales. Conclusions: Physical rehabilitation of patients in the restorative period of cerebral stroke by ischemic type reduces the degree of expressivness of neurological manifestations, positively affects cognitive functions, contributes to reducing manifestations of depressive and anxiety symptoms, increases the functional capacity of the patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".