MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226383384 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a7492

An In-Depth Analysis of Brain and Spine Neuroimaging in Children with Abusive Head Trauma: Beyond the Classic Imaging Findings

2022· article· en· W4226383384 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Abuse and Related Trauma
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersTexas Children's Hospital
KeywordsNeuroimagingHead traumaPresentation (obstetrics)Magnetic resonance imagingPoison controlHead (geology)Diffuse axonal injury

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abusive head trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in young children. Radiology provides valuable information for this challenging diagnosis, but no single neuroimaging finding is independently diagnostic of abusive head trauma. Our purposes were to describe the prevalence of brain and spine neuroimaging findings and to analyze the association of neuroimaging findings with clinical factors to determine which neuroimaging findings may be used as prognostic indicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children with a confirmed abusive head trauma diagnosis between January 2018 to February 2021 were included in this single-center retrospective study. Patient demographics, survival, Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission, length of hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay were examined. Brain neuroimaging findings were categorized as classic and nonclassic findings. Spine MRIs were also assessed for spinal ligamentous injury, compression fracture, and hemorrhage. The χ2 test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for the analysis. RESULTS: One hundred two children (male/female ratio: 75:27; average age, 9.49; range, 0.27–53.8 months) were included. Subdural hematoma was the most common (83.3%) classic neuroimaging finding. Bridging vein thrombosis was the most common (30.4%) nonclassic neuroimaging finding. Spinal ligamentous injury was seen in 23/49 patients. Hypoxic-ischemic injury was significantly higher in deceased children (P = .0001). The Glasgow Coma Scale score was lower if hypoxic-ischemic injury (P < .0001) or spinal ligamentous injury were present (P = .017). The length of hospital stay was longer if intraventricular hemorrhage (P = .04), diffuse axonal injury (P = .017), hypoxic-ischemic injury (P = .001), or arterial stroke (P = .0003) was present. The intensive care unit stay was longer if intraventricular hemorrhage (P = .02), diffuse axonal injury (P = .01), hypoxic-ischemic injury (P < .0001), or spinal ligamentous injury (P = .03) was present. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may suggest that a combination of intraventricular hemorrhage, diffuse axonal injury, hypoxic-ischemic injury, arterial stroke, and/or spinal ligamentous injury on neuroimaging at presentation may be used as potential poor prognostic indicators in children with abusive head trauma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicChild Abuse and Related TraumaFrench-language works237,207