Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perubahan sistem pemerintahan sentralisasi ke desentralisasi yang tertuang dalam UU 22 tahun 1999 tentang otonomi daerah, kemudian direvisi menjadi UU 32 tahun 2004 tentang pemerintahan daerah berdampak terhadap pemekaran wilayah diberbagai daerah. Dalam upaya pemekaran provinsi dan kabupaten baru, tarik-menarik antara kelompok yang setuju dan tidak setuju terhadap pemekaran daerah sebagai akibat dari otonomi daerah meningkatkan suhu dan iklim politik di tingkat lokal. Melalui penelitian studi pustaka teoritis otonomi daerah dan konsep pemekaran wilayah, didapatkan suatu pemahaman yang mendalam terkait kondisi pemekaran daerah di Indonesia. Isu kesejahteraan dan pembangunan daerah menjadi modus elit untuk mendorong pemekaran daerah. Tantangan kedepan pemekaran wilayah perlu dilakukan moratorium kembali, agar semangat pemekaran wilayah di Indonesia tidak terkontaminasi oleh kepentingan politik sesaat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".