Outage Probability Due to PDL Using Threshold Exceedances: Implications of DD-LMS Equalization and Inter-Channel Fiber Nonlinearities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The outage probability due to polarization dependent loss (PDL) is estimated using the method of threshold exceedances for a multi-channel transmission model that includes i) decision-directed least-mean-square equalization to partially compensate PDL, ii) the dominant fiber nonlinear effects of cross-phase modulation and cross-polarization modulation, and iii) transceiver noise. The outage probability is defined in terms of the bit-wise achievable information rate (BW-AIR) being less than a threshold value for the generalized mutual information determined by the forward error correcting code rate. The root mean square error between the mean excess function and a theoretical fit to it is used for the critical step of determining the threshold below which the BW-AIR data is represented by the generalized Pareto distribution. The applicability of the method of threshold exceedances is demonstrated for 32 Gbaud, dual-polarization 64-ary quadrature amplitude modulation with a uniform constellation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".