Semantic Segmentation of Coastal Zone on Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Point Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large-scale semantic segmentation point cloud is an ongoing research topic for on-land environments. However, there is a rare deep learning research study for the sub-surface environment. Although, PointNet and its successor PointNet++ have become the cornerstone of point cloud segmentation. However, these techniques handle a relatively small number of points. This poses a natural difficulty in a large spatial scene with millions of possible points. In particular, for shallow water of coastal zone, the small number of points where the seabed and water surface meet, close points may belong to different classes. In our work, we present the semantic segmentation on a large-scale airborne Lidar bathymetry (ALB) point cloud containing millions of sample points into two classes of water surface and seabed with the voxel sampling pre-processing (VSP) approach. The proposed approach will allow us to capture the complicated outdoor natural scene components of water surface and seabed more accurately and more realistic through nonuniform voxelization in the mixture of dense and sparse points of the ALB point cloud. The performance of validation results show improvement in a per-point accuracy of 72.45% compared with other state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".