MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226459701 · doi:10.1109/tte.2022.3158275

Real-Time Multiobjective Energy Management for Electrified Powertrains: A Convex Optimization-Driven Predictive Approach

2022· article· en· W4226459701 on OpenAlexaff
Yapeng Li, Feng Wang, Xiaolin Tang, Xianke Lin, Changpeng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPowertrainModel predictive controlEnergy managementComputer scienceBattery (electricity)Fuel efficiencyOptimal controlMathematical optimizationConvex optimizationNonlinear programmingAutomotive engineeringProcess (computing)Dynamic programmingEnergy (signal processing)Control engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Nonlinear systemRegular polygonTorqueAlgorithmPower (physics)MathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy management is an important technology for maximizing the energy efficiency of hybrid vehicles. In the process of developing cost-optimal powertrain control strategies, existing studies have explored the interactions between fuel economy and battery degradation to prolong the battery service period and reduce fuel consumption simultaneously. However, computational efficiency will be sacrificed in order to search optimal control sequences due to the nonlinear powertrain model and many optimization variables in the optimal control problem, which hinders the implementation in real-time applications. To this end, this article combines second-order cone programming and model predictive control algorithms to formulate a computationally efficient energy management strategy for a series hybrid electric vehicle. Specifically, three main contributions are made which distinguish our work from existing studies. First, based on the constructed convex powertrain model, two objectives, fuel economy and battery degradation, are optimized by the proposed hybrid algorithm. Second, a comparison study that compares the strategies with and without battery degradation optimization is presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy. Finally, by changing the size of the prediction horizon, several simulation results are discussed to evaluate the computational efficiency of the devised method. Furthermore, the effects of different battery and fuel prices on optimized results are analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207