MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226486514 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14888

Multi-Sensor Fusion for Navigation of Ground Vehicles

2021· dissertation· en· W4226486514 on OpenAlexaff
Arsalan Ahmed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemGPS/INSVisual odometryInertial navigation systemExtended Kalman filterOdometryComputer scienceComputer visionSensor fusionNavigation systemArtificial intelligenceKalman filterAssisted GPSInertial measurement unitInertial frame of referenceRobotMobile robotTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Navigation is a core requirement for autonomous vehicles and robotics. The objective of this thesis is to compute the navigation solution of a ground vehicle by fusing data from Inertial Navigation System (INS), Visual Odometry (VO), and Global Positioning System (GPS) using a Dual Extended Kalman Filter (DEKF) algorithm. The research in this thesis is conducted in three phases. The first phase deals with the development of a VO navigation system. In this phase the traditional Stereo Visual Odometry (SVO) methodology is analyzed, and an improvement is proposed at the pose estimation and pose optimization stages to present the Modified Stereo Visual Odometry (ModSVO) algorithm. The second phase deals with the development of INS/VO and INS/GPS integrated systems using EKF. It is shown that while accuracy improves compared to standalone sensors, but in case of VO or GPS failure the accuracy deteriorates. The third phase presents a solution to this problem by developing the INS/VO/GPS system using a Dual Extended Kalman Filter (DEKF) scheme. It is shown that the INS/VO/GPS system outperforms INS/VO and INS/GPS systems in cases of VO failure or GPS failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207