MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4226508215

Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update

2021· review· en· W4226508215 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Fleseriu, Richard J. Auchus, Irina Bancos, Anat Ben-Shlomo, Jérôme Bertherat, Nienke R. Biermasz, César Luiz Boguszewski, Marcello D. Bronstein, Michael Buchfelder, John D. Carmichael, Felipe F. Casanueva, Frédéric Castinetti, Philippe Chanson, James W. Findling, Mônica R. Gadelha, Eliza B. Geer, Ashley Grossman, Mark Gurnell, Ken K. Y. Ho, Adriana G. Ioachimescu, Ursula B. Kaiser, Niki Karavitaki, Laurence Katznelson, Daniel F. Kelly, André Lacroix, Ann McCormack, Шломо Мелмед, Mark E. Molitch, Pietro Mortini, John Newell‐Price, Lynnette K. Nieman, Alberto M. Pereira, Stephan Petersenn, Rosario Pivonello, Hershel Raff, Martín Reincke, Roberto Salvatori, Carla Scaroni, Ilan Shimon, Constantine A. Stratakis, Brooke Swearingen, Antoine Tabarin, Yutaka Takahashi, Marily Theodoropoulou, Stylianos Tsagarakis, Elena Valassi, Elena V Varlamov, Greisa Vila, John Wass, Susan M. Webb, Maria Chiara Zatelli

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineDiseaseMedical physicsCushing's diseaseMEDLINEIntensive care medicineDisease managementFamily medicinePediatricsPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations351
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)→Same topicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→