Becoming a Bride: Traditional Societies Coping with the Transition from Taboo on Sexuality to Family Life Among Bedouin Arabs and Haredi Jews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional societies in a modern setting regulate marriage and supervise sexual behaviour to guarantee survival of the traditional family structure. The taboo on sexuality prevents young people from obtaining reliable information on intimate relations between men and women before and after marriage. This study examines how two collectivist traditional communities, Bedouin Arabs and ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Jews, work through social, formal, and informal mechanisms to prepare young women for marriage. The findings show that while in the ultra-Orthodox community there is organized instruction encompassing Jewish law and behavioural norms and mental and emotional preparation for marriage, in Bedouin society such instruction is random, with the exception of one private instructor. While the ultra-Orthodox women describe this preparation as valuable and meaningful to them, the lack of social institutionalization of bride instruction leaves the Bedouin women at a disadvantage and preserves a patriarchal structure that harms her intimate rights and status in the family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".