MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4228997178 · doi:10.1111/imj.15_15766

SYMPTOMS‐TRIGGERED APPROACH VERSUS FIXED‐SCHEDULED APPROACH OF BENZODIAZEPINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF ALCOHOL WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME: NON‐RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

2022· article· en· W4228997178 on OpenAlexaff
Abdullah Al Alawi, Clinical Pharmacist, Juhaina Salim Al-Maqbali, Qasim Al-Maamari, Aisha Al-Huraizi, Nasiba Al Maqrashi, Ikhlas Al Busaidi, Emaad Al Shibli, Al-Reem Al-Senaidi, Shahd Al-Manwari, Ibtisam Al Busaidi, Fatema Muhanna, Ahmed Al Qassabi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternal Medicine Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAlcohol withdrawal syndromeRandomized controlled trialAlcoholAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Benzodiazepines are the drugs of choice for the treatment of Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) and the regimen can be as fixed-scheduled or based on symptoms-triggered approach. Due to limited information, we aimed to assess the effect of symptoms-triggered approach using (CIWA-Ar) score compared to fixed-scheduled of benzodiazepines for treatment of AWS on total dose, length of hospital stays (LOS), and rate of 90-days readmissions. Methodology: A single-center prospective non-randomized controlled group included all patients diagnosed with AWS and treated with benzodiazepines. Those admitted between 1st October 2019 to 30th September 2020 were treated with fixed-scheduled regimen (n=150) while all patients admitted between 1st November 2020 to 31st October 2021 were treated with symptoms-trigger regimen (n=50). Result: Symptoms-triggered regimen group showed a significant lower 90-days readmissions rate (HR 2.61,95% CI =1.18-6.84 p=0.01). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a significantly shorter duration to the first 90-days readmission in the fixed-scheduled regimen group (HR 2.3,95% CI 5.6-1.16; p=0.02). Symptoms-triggered regimen group required a significantly lower dose of diazepam (40 mg vs 10 mg; p<0.01) and a higher dose of thiamine (800 mg vs 600 mg; p<0.01). LOS was significantly increased in symptoms-triggered regimen group (3.9 vs 2.2 (IQR, days); p<0.01). Conclusion: The use of a symptoms-triggered regimen for treatment of AWS was associated with reduction of 90-days readmissions, increased duration to the first readmission, and reduced total dose of benzodiazepines, but longer LOS. Overall, symptoms-triggered regimen for treatment of AWS is safe, cost-effective and associated with reduced alcohol dependence relapse. Keywords: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome; benzodiazepines; fixed-scheduled regimen; symptoms-triggered regimen; CIWA-Ar score.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternal Medicine JournalSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207