Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity by Electrochemical and Chemical Methods, Kinetics and Thermodynamic Parameters of Superoxide Anion Radical towards Cupressus sempervirens L. Extracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the first time in this report, we determined the antioxidative capacity of Cupressus sempervirens extracts by using two methods such as inhibition of superoxide anion (0∙−2) made by alkaline pyrogallol, and electrochemical generation of this radical. We have studied the O2/0∙−2 redox couple on the GC in DMF. We obtained well-resolved quasireversible and reproducible cyclic voltammograms for the O2/O∙−2 redox couple. A ipaipc value of 0.96 and ΔEp value of 160 mV for scan rates 0.1 V/s were obtained. In addition, the standard electrochemical rate constant k∘ is 2.31×10−3 cm s−1; all these characteristics clearly show that the system is quasi-reversible. Furthermore, we have used the cyclic voltammetric to study the antioxidant capacity of Cupressus sempervirens extracts. The thermodynamic feasibility of the radical scavenging by extracts was accounted in term of standard free energy ΔG∘, which ranged from -8.934 to 0.042 kJ/mol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".