Analisa Potensi Ekonomi Daerah Dalam Rangka Penyusunan Kebijakan Pembangunan RPJMD Kabupaten Pasaman Tahun 2021-2026
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of the calculation of the LQ of the three basic sectors show a stable value from 2016 to 2020, where the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Sector is stable above 2 (two), the Water Supply Sector, Waste Management, Waste and Recycling and the Government Administration Sector, Defense and Mandatory Social Security are stable above number 1 (one) The three basic sectors obtained are relevant to the mission of the Regional Head, namely the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Sector which is relevant to mission 5 "Realizing a People's Economy Based on Local Excellence", the Water Supply, Waste Management, Waste and Recycling Sector is relevant to mission 4 "Improving Infrastructure Capacity ” and the Mandatory Government Administration, Defense and Social Security Sector relevant to mission 6 “Realizing Good and Clean Governance”. This shows that the development of the basic sector will be interrelated with the achievement of the RPJMD mission. So with a focus on developing the three basic sectors, it will support the achievement of missions 4, 5 and 6 of Pasaman Regency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it