FC044: Heterozygous Variants in Kinase Domain of NEK8 cause an Autosomal-Dominant Ciliopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS NEK8/NPHP9 encodes a protein that localizes to the primary cilium. Biallelic NEK8 variants are known to cause multiorgan developmental defects, including kidney cystic dysplasia and extensive extra-renal defects, with heterozygous carrier parents being asymptomatic [1]. This autosomal recessive inheritance is the most common inheritance mode for ciliopathies. Complementary to this, we now propose a dominant negative effect for specific heterozygous NEK8 missense variants in the kinase domain resulting in an autosomal-dominant ciliopathy. METHOD We performed genetic testing in patients from several medical centers. To explore the consequences of the identified NEK8 variants, we are performing cilia staining assays in patients' skin fibroblast and kidney cells, as well as in mIMCD3 cells overexpressing the identified variants. Furthermore, we are examining the impact of the NEK8 variants on replication stress response. RESULTS We identified three distinct heterozygous NEK8 variants in 12 families (Table 1), all leading to missense alterations in the kinase domain. Interestingly the p.Arg45Trp variant is a recurrent variant we detected in 10 unrelated families. All patients have a kidney phenotype that varies from mild focal segmental glomerulosclerosis to prenatal presentation with polycystic kidneys. Most patients have kidney failure needing kidney replacement therapy at varying ages of onset. In all patients, we thoroughly checked whether a second variant could be found. Furthermore, the large symptomatic family and de novo occurrences favor a dominant inheritance mode. Our preliminary results from functional studies show abnormal primary cilia formation in serum-starved cells as well as increased replication stress. CONCLUSION We present the first evidence for a pathogenic effect of heterozygous NEK8 variants. Remarkably our patients present with a kidney limited phenotype as compared to the multiorgan defects found in patients with biallelic variants. This reveals a new mode of inheritance for NEK8 variants and expands genotype-phenotype correlations for this gene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".