MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229015682 · doi:10.51952/9781529216677.ch005

Emergent Tensions in Diversity and Inclusion Work in Universities: Reflections on Policy and Practice

2022· book-chapter· en· W4229015682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samantha Brennan, Gwen E. Chapman, Belinda Leach, Alexandra Rodney

Bibliographic record

VenueBristol University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Diversity (politics)Work (physics)Political scienceSociologyPsychologySocial scienceAnthropologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter reports on a collaborative workshop, organized jointly by the University of Guelph, Canada, and Bremen University, Germany, designed to share information and practices about the participants’ everyday experiences of ‘doing diversity’. The chapter illuminates the complex and messy relationships between policy and praxis and the extent to which institutional context praxis can shape understandings of how policies are enacted, embodied, and experienced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.013
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBristol University Press eBooksSame topicGender Diversity and InequalityFrench-language works237,207