Two Stop-Line Method for Modern T-Shape Roundabout: Evaluation of Capacity and Optimal Signal Cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uncoordinated traffic flows at the traditional roundabouts, especially with a small circumference and fewer lanes, are often heavily affected by congestion, which escalates fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, idling, and travel delay. An intriguing way to mitigate such uncoordinated flows at junctions would be facilitated through optimal traffic signalization. For this purpose, this paper presents a novel holistic Three-Leg Signalized Roundabout (TLSR) model based on two signalized stop lines (2SL). The first stop line is placed at each entry curve of a roundabout with effectual lane markings as usual. Hereafter, the second stop line is set exclusively in the circulatory roadway to improve left-turning mobility with an additional “short-lane model” to deal with heavy traffic, following specific patterns for smooth vehicle merging. The capacity and optimal signal cycle relationships are derived to evaluate the performance of the proposed TLSR-2SL, considering the internal space constraints of the roundabout. Under the various scenarios, the parameters’ sensitivity tests demonstrate that signal cycle and central radius play a significant role in enhancing the roundabout’s operational performance. From the executed simulation, the proposed framework improves the traffic flow by 15% and controls the relative error within 10% compared to benchmark methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".