MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229020572 · doi:10.1063/5.0086182

Coexistence of infinitely many patterns and their control in heterogeneous coupled neurons through a multistable memristive synapse

2022· article· en· W4229020572 on OpenAlexaff
Zeric Tabekoueng Njitacke, Sishu Shankar Muni, Théophile Fonzin Fozin, Gervais Dolvis Leutcho, Jan Awrejcewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultistabilityMemristorChaoticSynapseNeuronAttractorBiological neuron modelNonlinear systemComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Biological systemPhysicsStatistical physicsNeuroscienceControl theory (sociology)Control (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceBiologyMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomenon of hidden heterogeneous extreme multistability is rarely reported in coupled neurons. This phenomenon is investigated in this contribution using a model of a 2D FitzHugh-Nagumo neuron coupled with a 3D Hindmarsh-Rose neuron through a multistable memristive synapse. The investigation of the equilibria revealed that the coupled neuron model is equilibrium free and, thus, displays a hidden dynamics. Some traditional nonlinear analysis tools are used to demonstrate that the heterogeneous neuron system is able to exhibit the coexistence of an infinite number of electrical activities involving both periodic and chaotic patterns. Of particular interest, a noninvasive control method is applied to suppress all the periodic coexisting activities, while preserving only the desired chaotic one. Finally, an electronic circuit of the coupled neurons is designed in the PSpice environment and used to further support some results of the theoretical investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear ScienceSame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207