Prevalence of peripheral spondyloarthritis among patients with ultrasound‐confirmed enthesitis: Single‐center cross‐sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) in patients with ultrasonography (USG)-confirmed enthesitis. The secondary aim of the study was to reveal the demographic, clinical, and ultrasonographic differences of patients diagnosed with pSpA. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with USG-confirmed enthesitis were evaluated by a rheumatologist to evaluate if they met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for pSpA. Elementary lesions assessed by USG were based on the definition of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology in Clinical Trials group which included hypoechogenicity, thickening, Doppler signal within 2 mm of bone, enthesophytes, bone erosions, and calcifications. For all patients, clinical and demographic data included: age, gender, smoking habits, body mass index, comorbid diseases, symptom duration, enthesitis region, the presence of bilateral enthesitis, entheseal pain visual analog scale (0-10), standardized enthesitis count following Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) and SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index. RESULTS: Eight (13.6%, 95% CI 6.0% to 25.0%) of 59 patients were diagnosed with pSpA according to the ASAS classification criteria. Participants diagnosed with pSpA had a longer duration of symptoms (54 vs 12 months), were more likely to present bilateral enthesitis (87.5% vs 49%) with higher SPARCC (11 vs 3) and MASES (6.5 vs 2) scores and higher C-reactive protein (7 vs 3.2 mg/L) concentrations. Entheseal Doppler signal and hypoechogenicity were also more frequently observed (50% vs 0% and 100% vs 49% respectively). CONCLUSION: Peripheral SpA is not uncommon among patients presenting with enthesitis and more likely in cases with prolonged, extensive, and bilateral enthesitis with entheseal hypoechogenicity and Doppler signal. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography can facilitate the diagnosis of pSpA in patients presenting with enthesitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".